2006 News Alerts from RMGO

Colorado elections: Conservatives won while Liberal Republicans lost

Colorado elections: Conservatives won while Liberal Republicans lost

Though the media isn't reporting this November’s election this way, the simple fact is that pro-gun conservatives are about the only candidates who survived the Democrat landslide of 2006.

Even a cursory look at the winners from this year’s General Election show that the Republican elected officials are getting more pro-gun -- and Republican compromisers can't win.

Consider this:

Congressional District 4: Marilyn Musgrave (who ran an amendment this year to get rid of the federal trigger locks compromise cut by the NRA) survived a tough and extremely expensive challenge.  With more than $4 million spent against her, Marilyn Musgrave defeated anti-gun Democrat Angie Paccione, who had regularly voted against gun rights while in the state legislature.

Congressional District 5: Finally, after 20 years of do-nothing Joel Hefley occupying a seat, Colorado Springs now has a hardcore pro-gun conservative in Doug Lamborn. Lamborn defeated a number of weak, moderate candidates, including Jeff Crank, who El Paso County insiders say was being privately advised by arch gun-blamer GOP consultant Steve Durham.  Lamborn been nothing short of a hero while serving 12 years in the state legislature, and we expect even better while he is in Congress.

State Legislature: Mike Kopp handily won a State Senate seat after narrowly defeating a liberal incumbent in the primary.

Gun-hater Tom Mauser worked tirelessly -- and in vain -- to defeat Kopp, who represents the Columbine area.  Kopp had defeated moderate incumbent Senator Kiki Traylor in the primary by a slim margin, only to watch liberal Republicans jump ship and work for the Democrat.  When Mauser and company started attacking 82nd Airborne Sgt. Kopp for his pro-gun stances, liberal Republicans (again, the name Steve Durham surfaces) advised the Republican party to jump ship and assume all was lost.  RMGO’s Political Action Committee dove in heavily with mail, phones and grassroots support to help Kopp win the general election handily.

In Weld County Scott Renfroe was a dark horse from the day he decided to run for Senate District 13, which was being vacated by State Sen. Dave Owen.  The Republican muckety-mucks had already picked State Rep. Dale Hall (R-Greeley) as the replacement, despite his liberal positions virtually every issue important to voters in that conservative district.

Gov. Bill Owens, and almost every high –ranking official in the GOP, endorsed Dale Hall, including the NRA.  In the end it was Hall’s anti-gun voting record that defeated him: Hall had voted for the statewide database of concealed carry permit holders, and had even sponsored a bill in 2006 to give the BATFE more power in Colorado.  Renfroe, an RMGO member, defeated Hall in the primary and a Ward Churchhill clone in the general.

To top off the Senate, Vermont law proponent Sen. Greg Brophy won an easy race in Northeastern Colorado, and State Rep. Dave Schultheis cruised to victory in El Paso county to secure Lamborn’s open State Senate seat.  State Rep. Ted Harvey of Highlands Ranch beat a millionaire in the primary and easily won his Douglas County Senate seat in November.  This core of constitutionalists form a solid base in the Senate, even if the Democrats retain control.

On the State House side, Kent Lambert joins with conservatives Cory Gardner (who carried our Make My Day expansion law last year) and David Balmer, among others.  As of the writing of this article the fate of State Rep. Bill Crane (R-Arvada) is still unknown.  Some will remember that Crane has carried legislation to get rid of the statewide database of concealed carry permit holders.

All of these candidates stood firmly for our gun rights in primaries and general elections, and they were rewarded with a seat.

Many of these candidates were told, as they were considering whether to run for office, that their pro-gun views would make them vulnerable should they win a primary and face a Democrat in November.  All of these predictions were proven false.

There are also some lessons learned by defeat, though you won't read this in the papers either:

Bob Beauprez followed the same old, failed strategy as so many high-level GOP statewide candidates have: act like a conservative when you face a primary, but move sharply to the middle afterward.

And while the NRA and CSSA spent much of their time explaining why Bill Ritter is bad on guns (he is terrible, no doubt), they failed to mention that Bob Beauprez actually signed the 2000 SAFE ballot initiative to close the so-called "gun show loophole."  That alone should give gun owners reason for pause, and it did.

What Beauprez, and other establishment types in the GOP, don't get is that though gun owners often vote on the lesser of two evils in cases like this, they don't put their heart and soul into races where there is no clear hero. That means less volunteers, less coffee shop enthusiasm and less money. Yes, we usually vote Republican, but we aren't force multipliers the way we are when we are excited about a solidly pro-gun candidate.

The people who run Trailhead and those in their orbit (mostly Gov. Owens' people, like Katie Atkinson) are also big losers in this election. For the second election in a row, they proved they don't know how to win elections. During the primary they attempted to scare conservatives away from running primaries. Not only did their more liberal candidates lose the primary, but their predictions also did not come true (that conservatives winning primaries means they'll lose the general election). If that's the case, why did Bob Beauprez trail the down-ticket conservatives within a given district?

The lesson of the GOP defeats: the establishment (which often tells good guys to "moderate" their stance on guns) is a lead anchor, and their ideas are failing the GOP.  “Moderation” excites no one, and only serves to further the ambitions of weak-kneed politicians, rather than rewarding heroes who fight for our issues.

A one-line synopsis of last night's results are: Moderate/liberal Republicans lost, while conservative, pro-gun Republicans won.

Now it's time to get ready to endure the Democrat party in full power in Colorado. Their consultants have been telling them for a number of years that gun control is a loser for their party, and should be left alone. We'll see if Democrats heed that advice.

2006 Fort Morgan Machine Gun Shoot Pictures

2006 Fort Morgan Machine Gun Shoot

Click on each thumbnail for a larger picture

Dudley Brown
on the Bren gun

WWII era 57mm ATG
(firing 40mm ammo)
Jacob on
the Greasegun
Dan firing Greasegun from Halftrack
Video of Dudley
firing Thompson

(right click to save)

Video of
Jacob firing
the Greasegun

(right click to save)

Pro-Gun Candidates Sweep Colorado GOP Primaries

Pro-Gun Candidates Sweep Colorado GOP Primaries

RMGO's PAC goes 100%

August 9, 2006 - While the papers aren't fully reporting what happened, last Tuesday's Republican primaries were a major victory for pro-gun forces.  Not only did gun owners virtually sweep the state, but we can now look forward to a new, young crop of legislators who are willing to go the extra mile to defend your rights.

The most notable case is in Senate District 13, which covers most of Weld County.  In that race, State Rep. Dale Hall seemed the likely winner.   In fact, he was endorsed by the NRA, and had a number of local elected officials endorsing him.  One problem: Dale Hall had voted against your gun rights on a number of occasions, and in 2006, Hall sponsored a bill to give the ATF more power in Colorado (see cartoon thumbnail below).  Apparently, the NRA hadn't done their homework (or didn't care that Renfroe was stronger on the gun issue, as they were only interested in siding with the perceived likely winner).

RMGO's PAC, which can get involved directly in campaigns, sided with newcomer Scott Renfroe (an RMGO member) and mailed gun owners in the district on several occasions.  The result: pro-gunner Scott Renfroe beat Dale Hall by almost 20%.

This wasn't the only victory in the Primaries.  State Senator Doug Lamborn taking the 5th Congressional District was a major advance, and should give Gun Owners of America a strong hand in Congress.  Below are a list of races where RMGO PAC was involved directly.

In all, a great night.  Congratulations, all of you who helped -- especially those who donated to the Rocky Mountain Gun Owners Political Action Committee.


5th Congressional District - Doug Lamborn

State Senate:

District 7 - Matt Smith Lost

District 13 - Scott Renfroe handily defeated State Rep. Dale Hall

District 22 - Mike Kopp beat Kiki Traylor and Justin Everett

District 30 - Gun rights hero Ted Harvey beat Mark Baisley

State House:

District 14 - Kent Lambert defeated Colin Mulaney

This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Vote Pro-Gun in the Primary Elections

Vote Pro-Gun in the Primary Elections

A view from RMGO's Political Action Committee

August 7, 2006 - Tomorrow both of Colorado's major political parties will have their Primary elections.  Since the Democrat party is largely 98% - 100% anti-gun, we'll confine our remarks to the GOP.

In many areas of the state, the primary election IS the election. If you vote in November but failed to vote in a primary during a hot race, you have only yourself to blame if (when) the Republican candidate sells out your gun rights. In areas where Republicans vastly outnumber Democrats, a smart gun-rights activist will always vote in the GOP primary.

With that in mind, I'll give you my personal assessment (I've been a professional political consultant for 17 years, and have a decent track record of determining who is going to be pro-gun as well as who isn't) as well as RMGO's viewpoint (actually, our PAC's) of the hotly contested primaries around the state.

NOTE: RMGO PAC does not endorse candidates who are not willing to answer our tough survey 100%, regardless of their opponent.


5th Congressional District:

Dudley's pick: Doug Lamborn
RMGO's pick: Doug Lamborn
Gun Owners of America's pick: Doug Lamborn

This race is race is a gun owners' best case: With a field of six Republicans running for the nomination (and the winner sure to be elected), one might think there would be lots to choose from. There isn't: Doug Lamborn is the only choice.

Congressman Joel Hefley has been in that seat for 20 years -- maybe one of the most conservative seats in America. Hefley has never pushed any conservative issues: on guns, he's merely reactive. What has Hefley done for freedom? Squat - Jack Squat.

That being said, we don't need another reactive member of Congress. We want a true gun rights hero.

There are others in the field who merit a look, but all of them are a serious gamble, with very poor odds. Even a cursory look at Jeff Crank's supporters shows a preponderance of moderates: Ed Jones, Bob Gardner, and the entire El Paso county GOP left wing corps is the base for Crank, which tells you something about him.

Doug Lamborn, on the other hand, has been a certified, true-blue HERO in the state legislature since 1995. Almost no one can claim that -- heck, no one can.

Lamborn carried our Vermont-style concealed carry bill, a REAL Vermont carry bill, and in 2006 was the Senate sponsor of our Castle Doctrine or "No duty to retreat" bill.

When the pukes were sticking it to Colorado gun owners with their Baby Brady bill (in the session after Columbine), Lamborn was one of the very few to stand up and say no... and work against the bill. He's forced votes, worked with conservative groups, etc.

In fact, I couldn't even begin to list all of his deeds. But that's why Gun Owners of America PVF, and me personally, has endorsed Lamborn.


State Senate:


District 7
Dudley's pick: Josh Penry
RMGO's pick: No endorsement, but do NOT vote for Matt Smith

Though Josh Penry didn't earn our endorsement, Matt Smith has earned our anti-endorsement ten times over. Smith has openly attacked RMGO (because we held him accountable for the bad gun votes he cast as a State House member). Whatever you do, do NOT vote for Matt Smith.


District 13
Dudley's pick: Scott Renfroe
RMGO's pick: Scott Renfroe

This Weld County district may be the hottest primary in the State. Conservative newcomer Scott Renfroe, an RMGO member, is running against State Rep. Dale Hall. Renfroe surprised everyone -- except those who know him -- by top-lining Hall at the Convention. Hall's votes in the legislature have been terrible on guns, and just this year Hall was the main sponsor of a bill to give the federal BATFE -- the agency tasked with jailing gun owners -- more power! This race baffled some gun owners when the NRA endorsed Hall the same day they got a piece of mail from RMGO trashing Hall for his bad votes. If you live in this district, it's a no-brainer: Renfroe is the hands-down pro-gunner.

Click image above for full-size cartoon RMGO's PAC commissioned for this race


District 22
Dudley's pick: Mike Kopp
RMGO's pick: Mike Kopp

This southwest Metro area race pits newly appointed Senator and Pediatrician Kiki Traylor against 82nd Airborne Sgt. Mike Kopp. Though there's a third candidate, his single digit support hardly warrants comment.

Kopp is a rock-solid gun vote, while Traylor is untested on the issue. Given Traylor's occupation, her unwillingness to answer our candidate survey and her association with leftist Republicans, Mike Kopp is an easy choice. Support Kopp if you are able to vote in this district.

Click image above for full-size image of Kopp


District 30
Dudley's pick: Ted Harvey
RMGO's pick: Ted Harvey

From the first session in the Colorado House, Ted Harvey has had the guts to take on all comers for our gun rights. He's been a strong advocate for our issue, our organization, and our cause in general. His millionaire opponent seems more interested in catty personal attacks. Easy vote here: Move State Rep. Ted Harvey to the Senate.


State House:


District 14
Dudley's pick: Kent Lambert
RMGO's pick: Kent Lambert

Kent Lambert has been a staff member for the conservative wing of the legislature, the Republican Study Committee, and has been a good member of RMGO. He's a solid character who plays on the conservative (read: pro-gun) team, whereas his opponent isn't interested in working together. Easy pick: Lambert.

Click image above for picture of Lambert teaching his daughter how to shoot


These are all the races we feel comfortable giving you a good assessment of the race, much less endorsing a candidate. There are other primaries around the state, but RMGO hasn't taken a position on others.

Now get out and VOTE!

Musgrave passes amendment to ban enforcement of Trigger Lock provisions

Musgrave passes amendment to ban enforcement of Trigger Lock provisions

June 29, 2006 -- Last night Colorado Congresswoman Marilyn Musgrave passed an amendment to an appropriations bill that stops the federal government from implementing the trigger lock provisions of the gun lawsuits liability bill passed by the NRA last year.

Second Amendment Caucus co-chair
Marilyn Musgrave offers amendment
on the House floor to remove the
Trigger Lock requirements imposed by
the NRA's Gun Lawsuits Liability
bill of 2005.

The Musgrave Amendment (an amendment to the Science, State, Justice, and Commerce Appropriations bill) will allow no funds to be made available (to the Justice Department) to carry out section 924(p) of title 18. This section is the penalties section relating to the new trigger lock law that says that every handgun sold, must be sold with a trigger lock.

The penalty for manufacturers, importers and licensed dealers who fail to provide a trigger lock with a sale of a handgun is:

· Suspension for not more than 6 months, or revoke license.

· Fine of not more than $2,500.

The trigger lock provision was part of the Firearms Manufacturers Protection bill that was signed into law on Oct. 26, 2005. The trigger lock provision took effect on April 24th, 2006.

Musgrave's amendment garnered 230 aye votes and 191 noes.

You can view the vote at http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2006/roll343.xml

Before the vote, it looked like the amendment might die because the NRA had not taken a position. When pressed by hill staffers, the NRA simply didn't take a position.

The NRA's reasoning for not getting involved was "our plate is just too full right now."

Full? Full doing WHAT? The reason the NRA didn't touch this -- they didn't even send an e-mail to members of Congress to ask for their vote on the amendment -- is because the NRA never wants to do anything they might not win, thus paralyzing themselves with fear. But if you ask a gun owner, more than anything else they want gun rights organizations to fight for their rights -- and fight hard.

This rationalization by the NRA is the very reason they have compromised so many times: capitol insiders predict "you can't possible win that issue", and so the NRA backs down.

Remember that early in 2005 the NRA claimed they would strip out these bad provisions after they passed the gun lawsuits liability bill in the Senate. Then, when the trigger lock provisions were added in the Senate, they claimed they HAD to pass this bill ASAP, and would strip the trigger lock provisions later. They put a full court press on Congress to pass a bill with trigger lock provisions, and dismissed them as meaningless.

Anyone who needs their firearm in a hurry, but has been fed the lie about trigger locks, won't call this capitulation on trigger locks meaningless.

This amendment was an attempt to undo what the NRA did in 2005 -- and it passed, despite the naysayers in the institutional gun lobby.

Now we need to get the same amendment attached to the appropriation in the Senate.

Bad news for Colorado Gun Owners

Bad news for Colorado Gun Owners

June 5, 2006 -- I just got a call from John Sternberg, the plaintiff in the suit against the city and county of Denver.

John has put a lifetime's worth of work into a suit to try to force Denver to follow the 2003 Preemption legislation passed by the Colorado General Assembly.

John said the Colorado Supreme Court just announced they split their decision on his appeal to the November 2004 Meyers decision. 3 justices wanted to overturn Meyers, while 3 wanted it to stand. A new justice could not vote on the case because she had been involved in it prior to her appointment.

That means the Nov. 2004 Meyers decision, which ruled that our state constitution's "Home Rule" provision allowed Denver to ignore some provisions of the preemption law, is now in effect.

Click here for the text of the decision.

You can read the November 2004 Meyers decision at: http://www.rmgo.org/denverruling.htm

You can read our Amicus brief on this case at: http://www.rmgo.org/amicus.shtml

John Sternberg promised us a short memo on what today's Colorado Supreme Court InDecision mean's to gun owners, and when we get that we'll forward it.


2006 Morgan Shoot

Annual

 

.50 Cal

.50 Cal BMG Rifle & Machine Gun
FUN SHOOT!

 

.50 cal BMG

Military Vehicle Display

M4

April 14, 15 & 16
Morgan County, Colorado 
(70 miles from downtown Denver, directions below , MAP)
Hosted by 
Rocky Mountain Fifty Caliber Shooting Association

Times of Shoot                     Fri. 3:00 pm - 9:00 pm
Sat. 8:00 am - 9:00 pm               
Sun. 8:00 am - 12:00 Noon
Gate Open to Public: 8:00 am  Saturday and Sunday to general public

Fees:  Spectators $10.00 each (RMGO members $7 with coupon -- click here for coupon)       Children under 12 FREE

Free admission to Military and LE with ID

• All Spectators Must Use Hearing & Eye Protection •

• No rain checks - we shoot rain or shine.

• No benches shelter or seating provided. 
Please bring your own (such as a fold-up chair)

No alcoholic beverages allowed on the property

This is NOT a Gun Show - No Gun Sales are allowed

 

DIRECTIONS -
From I-76 --
Exit at Hudson (30 miles from I-25) and go East on Highway 52 (though Hwy. 52 curves North to Wiggins, go straight East) for 37 miles on paved/dirt road to intersection of Road F & Road 14 (14 miles east of the Weld/Morgan county border).  Follow the .50 signs!

From I-70 --
Bennett exit go North on State Hwy. 79 for 23 miles to State Hwy. 52 at Prospect Valley; go East on Highway 52 (Hwy. 52 curves North to Wiggins, go straight East) to intersection of Road F & Road 14 (14 miles east of the Weld/Morgan county border).  Follow the .50 signs!

Map