|
At Least One Colorado Sheriff Entering Concealed Carry Permit Holders into
Criminal Database
Jan. 20, 2003 - We've been working on an issue that
developed, of all places, in a county that has more per capita permits than any
county in Colorado.
Just a few weeks ago RMGO Northern Colorado Coordinator
Ray Hickman was contacted by Dell Bean, a former law enforcement officer.
Bean was returning home from vacation when a State Trooper
pulled him over for no front license plate. When the Trooper accessed his in-car
computer database, Bean came up as a concealed weapons permit holder in CCIC,
the Colorado Crime Information Center database.
You can read more about CCIC at:
http://cbi.state.co.us/ccic/default.asp
You can also read a Fort Collins Coloradoan article at:
http://www.coloradoan.com/news/stories/20030118/news/801521.html
To summarize, the CCIC database is used as an "index of
wanted and missing persons and property, to identify: people and property
involved in crime; members of criminal gangs; stolen property; criminal
suspects; criminal methods of operation; reported crime; reported arrests; and
to share crime bulletins about major crimes in other states from which suspects
may flee to Colorado."
In other words, permit holders -- who have already proven
themselves law-abiding citizens -- are lumped in with rapists, murderers,
burglars and thugs. When Hickman was confronted with the information by
Bean, RMGO staff began an investigation of this practice.
We have asked a legislator to request from CBI -- which
administers the CCIC database -- a list of Sheriffs who are entering permit
holders into the database as well as CBI's statutory authority for doing so. To
date, the legislator has had no response.
Larimer County Republican Sheriff Jim Alderden began the
practice of entering these names in CCIC late last year, ostensibly following
the lead of former Boulder County Sheriff George Epp, a Democrat.
Alderden has issued more than 2,000 concealed weapons
permits, including a brief period when he issued them for free in response to
the 9/11 attacks.
But Alderden clearly has a blind spot. He's obviously more
concerned with how he is seen by law enforcement agencies, who are notoriously
anti-gun, than his constituents.
Alderden was elected almost entirely on the concealed
carry issue when he challenged Republican Sheriff Richard Shockley in a GOP
primary. Clearly, it was the gun issue that trounced Shockley.
While there are many law enforcement officers who are
supporters of the constitution, they are becoming the exception rather than the
rule. The push of law enforcement associations to create stricter gun laws has
pushed the average law enforcement officer far to the left of their natural
allies, the law-abiding gun owners.
RMGO's Executive Director confronted a Democrat sheriff
about the practice of entering permit holders into CCIC, and the sheriff quickly
denied any intention of doing so.
The sheriff's reason for not entering permit holders into
CCIC? When the idea was floated at a Sheriff's association meeting, the Democrat
sheriff quizzed other law enforcement personnel about what they would do if they
pulled someone over who was flagged as a permit holder. The Democrat sheriff
said he was appalled by the comments of some officers he asked, and didn't want
to subject his permit holders to such a humiliating and possibly dangerous
situation.
Alderden claims the practice is for simple officer safety,
so an officer knows someone is likely armed when they are stopped.
Why would an officer be concerned about a citizen who has
taken the time and expense to get that permit in the first place? The
unfortunate answer is that law enforcement deals with, largely, the dregs of
society on day-in day-out basis. This leads them to treat EVERYONE as a "perp"
or perpetrator. "Everyone's a perp" is an extremely common phrase in law
enforcement circles.
While the issue of being flagged in a database as a
"dangerous person" is concerning, even more troubling is the potential of law
enforcement to link that information with other databases.
Imagine Denver Police Department linking CCIC information
to license plates. Citizens should shudder at the chilling effect on our
rights this system would have.
But ironically, it isn't coming from Denver. The threat is
coming from a sheriff who has been arguably the most pro-gun Sheriff in
Colorado.
Just this fall, Alderden issued a dozen permits to Denver
County residents. He came short of announcing that he would issue to any
law-abiding Denver resident, likely because of the heat he would have taken from
the County Sheriffs of Colorado (CSOC), which is Colorado's mafia for Sheriffs.
For years CSOC has been opposed to concealed carry
permits. Now that the tide has shifted against them, and almost every sheriff is
issuing permits, CSOC has tried to find ways to limit that authority. CSOC,
which is now run by George Epp and represented in the legislature by Peg
Ackerman, is an integral part of gun control efforts in Colorado.
How does this CCIC issue effect concealed carry reform in
the legislature?
For years, RMGO has warned legislators and gun owners
alike that any concealed carry reform bill had to have a prohibition on
statewide databases. We've run amendments to the NRA's concealed carry bills to
remove the database they establish in their legislation.
Senate Bill 24, sponsored by Sen. Ken Chlouber
(R-Leadville) and Al White (R- Winter Park) and drafted by the NRA, not only
encourages Sheriffs to share permit holder information but fails to prohibit
using CCIC as a registry of "dangerous persons."
Senate Bill 63 has a specific prohibition against any such
database. In SB63, Sheriffs are only allowed to determine validity of a permit
with their county maintained list of permit holders.
Some will claim a statewide database is needed to check
validity. But both concealed carry bills offered this session (and most in the
last 8 years of CCW debate) have been permits issued by a sheriffs department.
That means a simple phone call to the issuing sheriff's department will
authenticate the permit.
Anti-gunners want a statewide database, because it is the
kind of information that is otherwise difficult to acquire. That's why Sarah
Brady always insisted on a computer system at the federal level to log Brady
checks, and unfortunately, the NRA obliged her. It is these kinds of systems
that will be, undoubtedly, the tools to disarm Americans.
What can you do? If you are a Larimer county
resident, call Sheriff Alderden's office at 970-498-5100 and urge him to
discontinue the practice of lumping concealed weapons permit holders with
criminals. If you are permit holder in Larimer, you should demand he remove you
from the criminal database immediately.
Some Larimer County Permit Holders are considering filing
a lawsuit against the Sheriff for failing to disclose that he would enter your
name into the database.
For residents of other counties, standby: we'll post the
list of Sheriffs Departments that log you into CCIC as soon as we get them.
|