|
RMGO
About Us
Join / Contribute
Request Materials
Send Me Info
Contact Us
| Sign up for RMGO's E-mail List |
|
|
News
Latest News / Updates
Alert Archive
Gun Show Dates
Projects
Gun Law FAQ
ColoGunMarket.com
Merchant Awareness
Firearms Stats
Humor
Free Decals
Concealed Guide
Legislation
Billwatch 2008
Billwatch Archives
CO Delegation
Find State Officials
Brady Registration
Project Gestapo
Links
Freedom Quotes
Historical Index
GOA
NAGR
Links
Link to RMGO!
|
What Tuesday’s Election Results Mean to Colorado Gun Owners
Before we become too ecstatic over widespread
Republican election victories, it is worth a quick analysis of Tuesday’s
election – with a wary eye cast at both parties.
Colorado Legislature
Contrary to some “gun groups” reporting that
Republicans taking control of the Colorado Senate means we have a pro-gun
majority, the Senate hasn’t moved sharply to the right. While Sen.
President-elect John Andrews is an incredible improvement over Sen. Stan
Matsunaka, Andrews still has a number of squishy GOP senators in his 18 member
caucus. That means that one GOP defector changes the dynamics of any vote
(since there are a total of 35 state senators), and empowers the left. A
Democrat Senator today remarked in the Rocky Mountain News that Dem senators
would be working hand-in-hand with GOP “moderates” (we call them liberals) to
pass reasonable legislation (read: gun control). Also consider that with a
Republican House and Senate, and Governor Gun Control, the legislature is likely
to pass a concealed carry bill that all three like. That means a concealed
carry bill that weakens the current law. More about that later.
The Senate actually lost one conservative when
Marilyn Musgrave ran for Congress and her seat was redistricted into another
senate seat. The Senate’s conservative caucus consists of Bruce Cairns (R –
Aurora), Doug Lamborn (R – Colo. Springs), John Andrews (R – Centennial), Mark
Hillman (R – Burlington), and Jim Dyer (R – Littleton).
The state House saw Republicans lose one seat,
splitting the legislature 37-28. New faces Greg Brophy (R – Wray), Tom Wiens (R
– Sedalia) and Michael May (R – Parker) are likely candidates to join the
existing solid conservative caucus of Ted Harvey (R – Highlands Ranch), Mark
Cloer (R – Colo. Springs), Dave Schultheis (R – Colo. Springs), Pam Rhodes (R –
Thornton), Bill Crane (R – Arvada), Don Lee (R – Littleton) and Lauri Clapp (R –
Englewood). Though the jury is still out, these new faces are also candidates
to join the House’s real pro-gun group: Ray Rose (R – Montrose), Kevin Lundberg
(R – Loveland) and Bob McCluskey (R – Fort Collins). The loss of longtime
stalwart Rep. Mark Paschall (R – Arvada), who was term-limited, will force
younger conservatives to step up to the plate and do the dirty work Paschall had
been counted upon for.
Colorado Congressional Delegation
Though Republicans enjoyed a major shift in
power in Congress, the real story in Colorado is the election of St. Sen.
Marilyn Musgrave to Colorado’s 4th Congressional District. Musgrave
set the standard in the legislature for conservative votes, leading
conservatives during her stints in both the State House and State Senate.
Bob Beauprez, now considered the victor in the
7th Congressional District, is a mixed bag. Beauprez signed the SAFE
gun control ballot initiative in 2000 (the Boulder Daily Camera has a nice
interview with him where he proudly supports this insidious gun control scheme),
and more importantly, discouraged solid pro-gun candidates from running for
office when he served as GOP State Party chairman. While he clearly will vote
better than Mike Feeley, Beauprez will be a questionable vote on virtually every
gun issue – including the reauthorization of the assault weapons ban, which will
take place in the next 2 years. Gun owners in the 7th district
should be very cautious of Beauprez.
Conclusions
Why wouldn’t gun owners be excited about
passing ANY concealed carry bill, you might ask? First, understand that
virtually every sheriff now issues permits. With the election of new sheriffs
in Jefferson, Adams, Douglas and Arapahoe Counties, even more sheriffs will be
issuing permits. The problem remains Denver – which is the only major county in
Colorado that refuses to issue permits. So, the question remains: should we
pass a bill that weakens current law (current law only requires fingerprints and
a background check – no mandatory training, no needs requirement, etc, but
individual sheriffs place their own requirements on issuing) just so that Denver
residents can get a permit?
Our opinion is that any ccw law must be an
improvement over existing law – which means the current rights of citizens
should not be infringed.
Newly re-elected Gov. Bill Owens, Sen. Ken
Chlouber, and the NRA are already banging the gong to pass a bill that has
expensive and cumbersome government-mandated training requirements as well as a
centralized database of gun owners and criminal safezones (specifically K-12
schools, which is a bald-faced sell-out to the teachers union). All three of
these items weaken current law.
In Congress, there are concerns with having a
GOP controlled executive and legislative branch as well. Much of the “Homeland
Defense” legislation, which tramples on the rights of citizens, can be expected
to pass easily. We’ll have to remain hyper vigilant with this issue, as well as
the issue that will define our movement for decades to come: the reauthorization
of the Feinstein Assault Weapons ban, which must take place by Sept. 2004 or be
sunsetted.
In both the State Legislature and Congress,
gun owners should remember that our founding fathers created checks and balances
– termed “gridlock” now – to deny those who would destroy the fabric of our
freedoms. Put simply, gridlock is our friend.
E-mail us at RMGO.org
Return to RMGO Home Page
|
 |