RMGO Logo Rocky Mountain Gun Owners - Colorado's No-Compromise Gun Rights Organization
Join Rocky Mountain Gun OwnersContact UsSecure DonationSend Me InformationGun Laws Colorado Concealed Carry Guide

RMGO
   About Us
   Join / Contribute
   Request Materials
   Send Me Info
   Contact Us
 

Sign up for RMGO's E-mail List
Email:

News
   Latest News / Updates
   Alert Archive
   Gun Show Dates

Projects
   Gun Law FAQ
   ColoGunMarket.com
   Merchant Awareness
   Firearms Stats
   Humor
   Free Decals
   Concealed Guide

Legislation
   Billwatch 2008
   Billwatch Archives
   CO Delegation
   Find State Officials
   Brady Registration
   Project Gestapo

Links
   Freedom Quotes
   Historical Index
   GOA
   NAGR
   Links
   Link to RMGO!

 

Preemption to be voted upon by full Senate

Jan. 16, 2003 - SB25 by Sen. Jim Dyer (R-Littleton) would stop cities and counties from passing firearms-related ordinances that are stricter than state law. In legalese, it means that the State of Colorado would "occupy the field of law" in this area.

The problem is that, right now, local governments can and do use the legal status of "home rule" to push the gun control agenda they haven't been able to accomplish at the state legislature. Passing a preemption law would stop them from enacting new gun controls on the local level. However, it would not stop the state from enacting restrictions: our State Constitution is supposed to do that.

The bill passed the Senate Judiciary on Monday on a party line vote, but not before longtime State Patrolman and author of the Colorado Brady Act's "Guilty until proven innocent" provision, Sen. Ken Arnold (R-Westminster), added an amendment onto the bill that dooms open carry in the state.

Arnold's amendment allowed cities to ban the firing of guns within their boundaries (not a big deal, as few would want to violate this provision for any reason other than celebration), and to ban open carry as well. This means any city can pass an ordinance similar to Denver's (and many other municipalities) that would ban openly carrying a firearm, even while in a holster. It would have to be in a container, presumably on their way to a range.

SB25 is still good. It would - "may" would be a more accurate term, since courts will certainly interpret the bill - overturn Denver's and Vail's ban on assault weapons as well as Denver's brandishing law (possibly). But with Arnold's amendment, cities and counties could still ban open carry, a major consideration. It would also force Denver into recognizing a measure passed in the 2000 session, which allows the carrying of weapons in vehicles while traveling.

Preemption, such as written in this bill, is helpful, especially considering Colorado is likely to pass a concealed carry law in this session (more on these in a second Alert).

While both concealed carry bills have some form of preemption, SB25 would make it stronger.

We urge you to call your Senator this week (rumor has it that SB25 will be heard on the Senate floor as early as Friday morning) at 1-888-473-8136 (or 303-866-2316 for metro area callers).

Urge your State Senator to remove the open carry provision of the Arnold amendment and pass SB25.

If you aren't sure of your Senator, or want to find their e-mail address, go to:

http://www.state.co.us/gov_dir/leg_dir/senate/members/

RMGO - Colorado's Largest No-Compromise Gun Rights Organization

Copyright © 2008 Rocky Mountain Gun Owners
PO Box 27 - Windsor, CO 80550