Musgrave passes amendment to ban enforcement of Trigger Lock provisions

Musgrave passes amendment to ban enforcement of Trigger Lock provisions

June 29, 2006 -- Last night Colorado Congresswoman Marilyn Musgrave passed an amendment to an appropriations bill that stops the federal government from implementing the trigger lock provisions of the gun lawsuits liability bill passed by the NRA last year.

Second Amendment Caucus co-chair
Marilyn Musgrave offers amendment
on the House floor to remove the
Trigger Lock requirements imposed by
the NRA's Gun Lawsuits Liability
bill of 2005.

The Musgrave Amendment (an amendment to the Science, State, Justice, and Commerce Appropriations bill) will allow no funds to be made available (to the Justice Department) to carry out section 924(p) of title 18. This section is the penalties section relating to the new trigger lock law that says that every handgun sold, must be sold with a trigger lock.

The penalty for manufacturers, importers and licensed dealers who fail to provide a trigger lock with a sale of a handgun is:

· Suspension for not more than 6 months, or revoke license.

· Fine of not more than $2,500.

The trigger lock provision was part of the Firearms Manufacturers Protection bill that was signed into law on Oct. 26, 2005. The trigger lock provision took effect on April 24th, 2006.

Musgrave's amendment garnered 230 aye votes and 191 noes.

You can view the vote at http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2006/roll343.xml

Before the vote, it looked like the amendment might die because the NRA had not taken a position. When pressed by hill staffers, the NRA simply didn't take a position.

The NRA's reasoning for not getting involved was "our plate is just too full right now."

Full? Full doing WHAT? The reason the NRA didn't touch this -- they didn't even send an e-mail to members of Congress to ask for their vote on the amendment -- is because the NRA never wants to do anything they might not win, thus paralyzing themselves with fear. But if you ask a gun owner, more than anything else they want gun rights organizations to fight for their rights -- and fight hard.

This rationalization by the NRA is the very reason they have compromised so many times: capitol insiders predict "you can't possible win that issue", and so the NRA backs down.

Remember that early in 2005 the NRA claimed they would strip out these bad provisions after they passed the gun lawsuits liability bill in the Senate. Then, when the trigger lock provisions were added in the Senate, they claimed they HAD to pass this bill ASAP, and would strip the trigger lock provisions later. They put a full court press on Congress to pass a bill with trigger lock provisions, and dismissed them as meaningless.

Anyone who needs their firearm in a hurry, but has been fed the lie about trigger locks, won't call this capitulation on trigger locks meaningless.

This amendment was an attempt to undo what the NRA did in 2005 -- and it passed, despite the naysayers in the institutional gun lobby.

Now we need to get the same amendment attached to the appropriation in the Senate.

Bad news for Colorado Gun Owners

Bad news for Colorado Gun Owners

June 5, 2006 -- I just got a call from John Sternberg, the plaintiff in the suit against the city and county of Denver.

John has put a lifetime's worth of work into a suit to try to force Denver to follow the 2003 Preemption legislation passed by the Colorado General Assembly.

John said the Colorado Supreme Court just announced they split their decision on his appeal to the November 2004 Meyers decision. 3 justices wanted to overturn Meyers, while 3 wanted it to stand. A new justice could not vote on the case because she had been involved in it prior to her appointment.

That means the Nov. 2004 Meyers decision, which ruled that our state constitution's "Home Rule" provision allowed Denver to ignore some provisions of the preemption law, is now in effect.

Click here for the text of the decision.

You can read the November 2004 Meyers decision at: http://www.rmgo.org/denverruling.htm

You can read our Amicus brief on this case at: http://www.rmgo.org/amicus.shtml

John Sternberg promised us a short memo on what today's Colorado Supreme Court InDecision mean's to gun owners, and when we get that we'll forward it.


2006 Morgan Shoot

Annual

 

.50 Cal

.50 Cal BMG Rifle & Machine Gun
FUN SHOOT!

 

.50 cal BMG

Military Vehicle Display

M4

April 14, 15 & 16
Morgan County, Colorado 
(70 miles from downtown Denver, directions below , MAP)
Hosted by 
Rocky Mountain Fifty Caliber Shooting Association

Times of Shoot                     Fri. 3:00 pm - 9:00 pm
Sat. 8:00 am - 9:00 pm               
Sun. 8:00 am - 12:00 Noon
Gate Open to Public: 8:00 am  Saturday and Sunday to general public

Fees:  Spectators $10.00 each (RMGO members $7 with coupon -- click here for coupon)       Children under 12 FREE

Free admission to Military and LE with ID

• All Spectators Must Use Hearing & Eye Protection •

• No rain checks - we shoot rain or shine.

• No benches shelter or seating provided. 
Please bring your own (such as a fold-up chair)

No alcoholic beverages allowed on the property

This is NOT a Gun Show - No Gun Sales are allowed

 

DIRECTIONS -
From I-76 --
Exit at Hudson (30 miles from I-25) and go East on Highway 52 (though Hwy. 52 curves North to Wiggins, go straight East) for 37 miles on paved/dirt road to intersection of Road F & Road 14 (14 miles east of the Weld/Morgan county border).  Follow the .50 signs!

From I-70 --
Bennett exit go North on State Hwy. 79 for 23 miles to State Hwy. 52 at Prospect Valley; go East on Highway 52 (Hwy. 52 curves North to Wiggins, go straight East) to intersection of Road F & Road 14 (14 miles east of the Weld/Morgan county border).  Follow the .50 signs!

Map

Sign Up for Emails

Get Yours TODAY!
bluecard

Click here to see upcoming CCW Permit Classes offered by RMGO